Book Notes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Growth and Revitalization |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Leadership |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Spirituality |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Good and Beautiful God Notes |
After studying with Richard Foster, Henri Nouwen, Brennan Manning, and Dallas Willard, James Smith was asked to write a curriculum on “Christlikeness” that could be used by individuals and congregations. He came up with three books series called “The Apprentice Series,” of which The Good and Beautiful God, Falling in Love with the God Jesus Knows (IVP: 2009) is the first. The Good and Beautiful Life, and The Good and Beautiful Community will be the two other volumes, with a publishing date of January 2010 and September 2010 respectively. The Good and Beautiful God deal with the false stories we learn while growing up in America, and follows a three-fold outline: first, the false narrative we have within our minds; second, the narrative that Jesus taught; and third, a spiritual exercise to practice for the week. James Smith prefers that people would read a chapter of the book, practice the spiritual exercise, and then come together with others to discuss their feelings and thoughts, and encourage one another to become more like Christ. There are good discussion questions sprinkled through each chapter and at the end, and a small-group discussion guide for each chapter. Although there are some overlap between chapters, and there are a couple points that he could have amplified and explained better, on the whole it is a good easy-to-ready, thought-provoking book that should be a very good book for a spiritual formation or Sunday school class to use. Below is an outline of his book, some of which includes my own thoughts, and does not include Scriptural references. Read the book for a fuller understanding of the topics listed.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method of Change
|
I: Method of Change A. False narrative: change is just a matter of the will; we need to try harder
B. Jesus’ narrative: follow Jesus 1. We need new narratives to follow
2. We need new practices that will transform our hearts, which make us ready to hear and respond (“soul training exercises”)
3. We need to participate in a good community
4. We need to pay attention to the Holy Spirit
C. Exercise: Adequate sleep
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
God is Good
|
II. God is Good A. False narrative: God is angry and out to punish evil doers — tick for tack
B. Jesus’ narrative: 1. Good and bad happen to everybody
2. Seek the good which the good find: joy, peace, contentment, fellowship, etc.
3. Avoid the bad and evil that the bad usually find: guilt, loneliness, remorse, self-loathing, etc.
4. Recognize hardships are a part of being human and can help us develop our characters
5. Trust that God is good and that his purposes and goodness will eventually be discovered through the hardships. We might not see it on this side of eternity, but we will know it on the other side.
C. Exercise: Silently take notice of and enjoy God’s good creation.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
God is Trustworthy
|
III. God is Trustworthy A. False narrative: God is to be feared because he wants to send everyone to hell based on one single, unrepentant sin
B. Jesus’ narrative: God is Abba 1. God is present, pure, and powerful, who provides, pardons, and protects
2. As we experience God’s love and care through small problems, we will gain confidence and trust for major difficulties. Therefore, we need to be mindful of God’s presence, power, and blessings each moment of the day.
C. Exercise: Count your many blessings
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
God is Generous
|
IV. God is Generous A. False narrative: we have to earn God’s favor and we will be rewarded according to what we do
B. Jesus’ narrative: God is generous, good, and gracious 1. God’s attitude toward us is not determined by the extent of our love for him because God first loved us and will continually and always love us.
2. We don’t earn God’s love, but live out of gratitude for God’s love
3. Our actions deepen our love for God, they don’t condition God’s love for us.
C. Exercise: Pray Psalm 23
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
God is Love |
V. God is Love A. False narrative: God loves us ONLY when we are good; God continually judges our performance
B. Jesus’ narrative: God extravagantly and recklessly loves us 1. God wants us to acknowledge our sin and come to him
2. Specific sins don’t separate us from God, but rather being self- righteous, judgmental, and unforgiving.
3. Self-righteousness is turning away from grace and demanding justice and righteousness alone.
C. Exercise: Lectio Divina on 1 Cor 13:4–8.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
God is Holy
|
VI. God is Holy A. False narrative: 1. God is fixated on sin and out to get us—to destroy us with his wrath. He is the “Marquis de God.”
2. God has no concern about judging and condemning any one for sin. He is a “Teddy Bear God.”
B. Jesus’ narrative: God loves us into purity 1. Because God is holy and loving, he has a dedicated, definite, objective, just, and rational stance against evil.
2. He is against everything and everyone who will harm us.
3. God is not coercive; he does not force his will upon people.
4. God does not arbitrarily consign people to hell, he allows them to go there.
5. Hell is the place where God allows those who continually resist his love to remain in existence according to their own desires and will.
6. God operates first and foremost from grace, wooing people toward change and thus risks rejection.
C. Exercise: Find more margin in life—time to relax and to be with God.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
God is Self-Sacrificing |
VII. God is Self-Sacrificing A. False narrative: False Narrative: Jesus didn’t have to die on the cross. We could have worked our way to God, or God could just have overlooked our sins and verbally pardoned us without all of this “child abuse.”
B. Jesus’ narrative: 1. Total Depravity of humanity
2. The cross presents the depravity and gravity of sin
3. God took on our nature to transform us (Athanasius’ recapitulation theory).
4. God’s nature is to express self-sacrificial love for us and he demonstrates his love by dying on our behalf.
5. Simply and easily dismissing sin and its effects, and thus not demanding the cost/penalty of sin would make God both unjust and unholy.
6. Jesus did not have to die; he chose to die.
C. Exercise: read the Gospel of John.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
God Transforms
|
VIII. God Transforms A. False narrative: False narrative: my essential core self is a sinner. I have to sin and put up with the accompanying guilt.
B. Jesus’ narrative: my essential core self is being a saint. I have Christ within me and I can allow the presence and power of Christ to shine in me through my weakness and humbleness.
1. We are indwelt by Christ; we have entered into a new creation; we are meant to house the fullness and the glory of God within us.
2. We are susceptible to sin, but not enslaved to it.
3. Our identity is shaped by who we are and to whom we belong; not by what we do
4. God’s power is revealed through weakness and dependability.
5. My responsibility is to abide in Christ. a. Meditate on being in Christ
b. Practice Christian disciplines that deepen our relationship with God and clarifies God’s truth to us.
c. Be with a fellowship that reinforces God’s truth
d. Avoid things that go against our true nature.
C. Exercise: solitude and meditating on being “in Christ.”
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
How to Make a Pickle
|
IX. How to Make a Pickle A. False narrative: We must be productive and achieve many things as quickly as possible. “Hurried sickness.” Example: Martha.
1. Productivity, speed, and efficiency are the greatest values in life.
2. Idleness is the enemy of the soul.
3. Humans are gloried machines.
4. Put the “system,” the job, first
5. We are as valuable as the amount we produce or achieve (cf. Marxism).
B. Jesus’ narrative: slow down, listen, and take notice. Example: Mary.
1. Most valuable thing in life is to listen to Jesus.
2. In the spiritual life, we cannot do anything important in a hurried manner.
3. We need to create rhythm and balance: piety and mercy; contemplation and action; rest and labor; solitude and community; worship and service.
4. Eliminate some good things to be more attentive and deliberate in life.
5. Mastery of a subject as well as producing change takes a long time. Be persistent, and be encouraged that change will come as Philipians 1:6 promises.
C. Exercise: Slow down. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Return to Top | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shaped by the Word NOTES: |
Notes from this book contrast informational and formational reading of the Bible; reading Scripture as a discipline; reading it spiritually; and finally different techniques in reading the Bible for spiritual formation. Too often we read the Bible solely on an informational level, where we seek to (1) Cover as much as possible as quickly as possible to get at the "meat" and "what is needed;" (2) Move linearly and logically, going to point to point; (3) Master the text and put it under our control and understanding; (4) Manipulate the text so that it says what we already know it must or should say; (5) Be analytical, critical and judgmental, getting rid of wonder, mystery and miracles; (6) Find solutions to our own problems; (7) Squeeze more life out of the Source of life. Instead we should read more on a formational level, where we seek to (1) Meet God and allow a small portion of the text infiltrate our existence and form our relationship with God and with one another; (2) Be open to deeper dimensions of the text, not treating it superficially or reading quickly; (3) Allow the text to inform us as servants of the Word; (4) Make ourselves, and our relationship with God, the object of study, not the text; (5) Approach the text with humility, receptiveness and love, thus allowing the text to touch the core of our being and radically shape our existence; (6) Remain open to mystery, love and wonder, accepting that not all our problems and perplexities will be solved, understood, or gotten rid of; (7) Die to our old self in order to be transformed and live within the new life of Christ. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reading Scripture as a Spiritual Discipline
|
We need to read the Scripture as a spiritual discipline: (1) Offering up our own selves and setting apart specific time as a gift to God; (2) Recognizing God has specifically set the Scripture aside as the primary point of contact with us; (3) Being committed to read day after day, week after week, month after month, apart from any necessity of getting something out of it, or finding gratification or "success" with it; thus allow God to completely "waste" our time together, if that is what God wants; ["If God chooses not to use what you offer, you praise God and continue to offer it for God’s nonuse. You are not making demands on God. You are yielding yourself to allow God to do what God desires ... you are not manipulating God" (p. 116).] (4) Prayerfully remaining cognitive about your insights from scripture throughout the day; (5) Putting into practice and being obedient to what you learn; (6) Finding encouragement, support and accountability from other believers. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reading Scripture Spiritually
|
We read Scripture spiritually, as we (1) See our true selves as a Word of God being addressed and transformed by The Word of God (Jesus now lives in us and we are to be completely transformed into His image. Jesus is our true self); (2) See the Scripture as inspired by God and the place where God encounters us; (3) Strive to make all our values, structures, modes of being, thoughts and actions connected to and congruent with the new order of Being that judges everything and which will last for all eternity; (4) Open ourselves to a loving and yielded relationship with God, not trying to manipulate God or scripture as a means to a desired end; (5) Pray throughout the process, before, during and after; (6) Examine and apply the scripture to our own being and doing, our hearts and lives, our feelings, wills, thoughts and actions. The emphasis is formational because our culture over stresses information but we do need both. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1: Meditative Technique
|
Technique is not as important as one’s desire and approach to scripture. With the right motivation, expectation and perception any technique will be advantageous to spiritual formation. Four techniques were given: Meditative Technique; Harmony-Dissonance Technique; Imagination Technique; and If-You-Were-There Technique: Meditative Technique: slowly read the text multiple times, meditating on each sentence, phrase and word, returning to the text each time your mind wanders off of it. After careful and slow repetitive reading of the text, listen for God to speak to you. You might pray, "God, what are you saying to me here?" Then seek to be still and listen. ... God’s address is usually very pointed, very personal, very practical. It addresses the deep dynamics of our being and doing. The Word "penetrates to the division of soul and body, to the inner dynamics and focal essence of our being, discerning the thoughts and intentions of the heart" (Heb. 4:12). (Pgs 149 & 151.) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2: Harmony- Dissonance Technique
Return to Top |
Harmony -Dissonance Technique: Read a selected passage and note places that are harmonious or dissonant to your thoughts, attitudes, feelings or perceptions. Then return to those portions and ask what they reveal about your inner being, about your true self in Christ, about any need or joy in your life, about an action or application that needs to be made. As in the meditative technique, you need to still yourself before God and listen for answers to your questions. Again, remember that those points of harmony or dissonance will tend not to relate to superficial aspects of your being or doing. They may appear to start at the more surface level of your life; but if offered to God in openness and receptivity, you will find that these are points where God is addressing you at the deep levels of your being. (Pg. 152). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3: Imagination Technique
|
Imagination Technique: read a narrative or parable (a story line) and try to recreate all the smells, actions, words, sites and sounds. (Although Mulholland doesn’t suggest it, elsewhere I learned it is better, if you have time, to rewrite the story with all your imaginative details filled in.)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4: If-You-Were There Technique
|
If-You-Were There Technique: Similar to the imagination technique but instead of being an outside observer, you become a participant. Pick a character in the midst of the story and imaginatively retell the story from their perspective. If you were there, how would you have felt, thought, spoken or reacted? (God is sometimes an un-named character, and it is okay to imagine yourself being the main character, even if it is Jesus or God. Also note that at different points in your life, you will be drawn to different characters in the same story.) After imagining (and writing) the episode, meditate on what it reveals about your feelings, thoughts, decision-making process, and actions, and listen to what God might be revealing to you through this episode. (Ben Johnson says that after imaginatively putting yourself into the story, stop and ask yourself if God was there in your room, right there and then, and you could ask him just one question, what question would that be? Write down the question, and prayerfully offer it up to God, and then meditate on what you think God would say. Then write that down. On the basis of that one question and answer, apply it to your life today.) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Return to Top |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Creating
a Healthier Church
NOTES |
A congregation is like a family that has emotional ties, entanglements, problems and systems. No one individual acts on the basis of the self alone, but always in connection with others. Thus the single person can affect the whole system and the system affects the individual. This note will be about the separation and togetherness continuum; four distinctive styles of relating; and interpersonal triangles. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Separation and Togetherness Continuum
|
In the midst of being interconnected, there is a continuum between isolationistic individualism and being fused with the community as a whole and lacking an understanding of "self." A healthy system keeps people connected to the group while encouraging and allowing for self expression and differentiation. Individuals must balance separation and togetherness, and each individual has a different need, or comfort zone, in that balance than others. Some feel a need to be more connected and close to others; whereas others are quite happy to be more separate and apart. Problems arise when a person who has a greater need for togetherness tries to befriend and develop ties with one who has a greater need of separateness. Each one may misunderstand the advances and reaction of the other, and unless they communicate, the friendship will either never get far or break apart.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taking the individualism and togetherness continuum with the identifying with the group (fused) or apart from the group (from one's self - differentiated), we can discern four distinct relational styles: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1. The Enmeshed Relational Style
|
(1) Enmeshed - the need to be extremely close and together - people are so fully involved with each other lives that they see themselves as one family, without boundaries, and are easily off-balanced with criticisms or feelings of abandonment and are overly sympathetic to one another. Togetherness is defined as being the same. This system operating from this type of style usually breaks apart with major splits or with significant leaders acting out, usually sexually. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2. The Isolated Relational Style
|
(2) Isolated - having a need to be both isolated and alone while also being extremely tied to the system. People are so concern about unity that they won't express their true feelings or take any action that will upset the boat. Connections are maintained as long as relationships aren't too emotional, and thus are tenuous at best, and boredom easily enters into the system. American teenagers breaking away from the controls of their parents usually go through this stage. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3. The Connected Relational Style |
(3) Connected - individually differentiated yet close to one another - people mutually understand, respect and are connected to one another while supporting and celebrating their differences. The system will have a well-defined system of belief and ethics, without being rigid and dogmatic, allowing interaction with outsiders and with one another. "Power, authority, and hierarchy are recognized as simple organizational and political realities, not evils that have to be fought. These realities are known to have their limitations. [Nevertheless] ... group members will respect the chain of command, and members and leaders will do their part to keep open communication up and down the chain" (p. 109). | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4. The Alone Relational Style
|
(4) Alone - strongly individualistically defined and not having a strong need to be affiliated with a group. People who fit in this category are alone to be who they are and do not react to the pressures of others. They are crusaders and are able to state what and why they believe what they believe. They will help people because of their own convictions, not because it is expected, or from feelings of guilt. A congregation operating primarily from this perspective will be full of social and theological activists - radicals - and evangelists, and may have trouble coordinating the various activities and crusades of the individuals. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Triangles
|
Triangles are when an attempt of one person in a conflict tries to pull a third party into the conflict, usually apart from and without the knowledge of the second, original party. Triangles may be a way for people to talk out a difficult situation, a way to avoid responsibility and work in the conflicted relationship, or a way to keep issues from being openly discussed. Merely listening to a person complain, and thus either tacitly or explicitly agreeing with them against the other party, will truly not be beneficial to all concern. The complainer will not grow in understanding; their relationship will not improve; problems will not be settled; and the person being triangled will be pulled into the conflict. The best way to handle attempts of people to pull you into their problem with others is to keep the conversation focused on the two people currently present in the discussion: yourself and the complainer.
The person being triangled can ask the complainer why they think the relationship is problematic. What did they do to contribute to the problem? What can they do to help it? Why do they feel the way they feel? In other words, get the person to quit feeling like a hopeless victim and encourage positive action. The third party can also speak of their own experience and suggest appropriate action in the case, and if necessary, the third party can offer to moderate a meeting between the two. A mediator can encourage the parties to tell their stories, to understand one another, and then work on solutions and compromises. But this is only possible if there is good will between them and if they are comfortable talking about their hurts. The trick in mediating, though, is not to take one side over the other, no matter how just and righteous the cause may be.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Return to Top |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Firestorm NOTES |
Firestorm warns that any church can be destroyed by a conflict that gets out of hand. Ron Susek's primary illustration comes from a megachurch that had a cradle to grave ministry, with a bunch of programs, staff, land and vision. Their rapid growth hid major problems that eventually almost destroyed the church, causing the loss of its land, buildings, and good civic recognition. The good news is that they refocused, recovered, and with new leadership, became a good, sustaining, healthy church, although now a medium sized one. The book gives what Ron Susek considers a typical life cycle of a firestorm, the causes of a firestorm, how to fight a firestorm at its various stages, and finally how to help a congregation recover from such a firestorm. This note will detail the six phases of a firestorm, and give a simple summary of what to do to help keep a firestorm from igniting, "Act trim"; and then what to do in the midst of a conflict, "Implement the four R's." Finally it will quote two paragraphs on the church's need to care for her pastor. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Six phases of a Firestorm |
There are six phases: (1) sparks; (2) ignition; (3) full fury; (4) consuming winds; (5) final burn; and (6) rebuilding on burnt timbers. Sparks begin to fly as change comes into the congregation and misunderstandings, disagreements, and conflict arise. If communication channels are clear, if people have legitimate ways to complain, if the value of individuals is maintained over that of new programs, and if focus is on the issues involved and not on setting blame and guilt, then the sparks will not catch, otherwise things get worse. (2) Ignition occurs when interpersonal relationships and connections break down, as people develop resentments, nurture us-against-them attitudes, form competing coalitions, and despise diversity instead of respecting or glorifying it. In such a situation, one's own, or one's own group's image and power become more important than the whole group. At this point the church leadership must take immediate action. They cannot afford a wait-and-see attitude. The problem must be acknowledge, named, and brought out in the open. Church discipline may be necessary against people who are spreading rumors, gossip and slander, or who are ignoring proper organizational procedures. If necessary, a neutral third party can be brought in to negotiate and mediate. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Return to Top | (3) Full Fury. "Once
the firestorm erupts, chances of a good recovery virtually disappear.
Deep losses are almost inevitable" (p. 39). At this point the congregation
becomes polarized with each side out to destroy the other; people run on
emotions, not reason; error and mistakes are not tolerated; grace and spirituality
are thrown out as methods of handling the problem and replaced with legalism,
business models, and institutional rigidity. Humbleness, respect, and
mercy are ignored or seen as signs of weakness. "Perception becomes
the new reality. Truth is no longer the main issue. How each group
perceives truth hardens into 'fact'" (p. 46).
At this point, the pastor is generally in a no-win position and cannot lead the church out of the crisis alone, and thus should hire a crisis management consultant to intervene as soon as possible. If evil and sin are promoted, and if authority is being denigrated and disrespected (the pastor's, the board's, the denomination's - see 2 Pet 2:9-10), then church discipline needs to be started. "Do not be indecisive about issues. ... People tolerate minor mistakes in decision-making, provided they are told the reasoning, but they will not tolerate indecision" (p. 47). (4) Consuming Winds. Here the conflict is no longer contained within the congregation but moves out into the community and destroys the church's mission, service, evangelism, and community good will. People leave the congregation, money dries up; paranoia sets in; and open fighting occurs. At this point the church must work even more closely with an outside consultant. Without taking away human responsibility, leaders must recognize and teach the power of evil, and that we are engaged in a spiritual battle with demonic forces. The leaders must not allow Scripture to be used as a weapon against the factions, nor have sermons speak only about the conflict. Leaders must not neglect those who are uninvolved in the controversy; and can call the congregation to times of fasting and prayer; and "each leader, including the pastor, must determine whether it's best to stay or leave. Sometimes departing is best for both parties" (p. 53). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Return to Top | (5) Final Burn. Here
people are determined to destroy the opposition, even going to court to do
so. At this point, the leadership must reinforce that the problems
in the congregation are complex and not simply a one-sided affair. Blame
on one or a few is inaccurate and unproductive. The idea is to get people
away from destroying the "enemy" to solving problems and to own
up to their own hand in the mess or being complicit to it. The church may need to hire a
non-anxious, neutral
consultant or mediator to discover all the problems, people, and issues involved and to give
the parties another chance of being respectfully heard. "Do not
hesitate to terminate nonfunctioning ministries or sell excess property.
It is essential to preserve potential resources for future ministry.
Failure to do so may result in the eventual loss of everything" (p.
59).
(6) Rebuild. "The question to be asked is not, 'Did our side win?' but, 'How can we best glorify God in all that we do now?'" (p. 60). At this point, the congregation needs to set aside questions of "why?" or try to figure out all the details of what happened. Instead, the congregation needs to work on charity, forgiveness, and grace, leaving the bad behind, and start focusing on the good. Yet at the same time, repentance, restitution, reconciliation and justice must be implemented. Finally, the congregation must again refocus on the Great Commission. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Act TRIM to prevent a spark from igniting
|
As a quick synopsis
of the book and as a way to help us remember what to do to fight firestorms,
I've come up with this phrase: "Act Trim." Act,
don't wait for problems to surface; be proactive before a situation happens
by setting up and teaching guidelines, procedures, and expectations; and be responsive
when a problem starts.
In your action, pursue Truth, Relationships; Integrity, and Mission. Truth
Relationships
Integrity
Mission
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Implement the four "R's" in a conflict
|
During a conflict, implement the four R's: repentance, redemption, restitution; and reconciliation: Repentance
Redemption
Restitution
Reconciliation
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The care and creation of pastors |
The book has a lot more to offer, and I would highly urge any congregation that has gone through the process or is afraid they are in the midst of a firestorm to study this book. It would also be good for all church boards to study it as well as a preventive measure. It is very helpful, insightful, and easy to read. It deals with all the issues and people involved, including the church and denominational role in helping the pastor.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Return to Top |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Temporary Shepherds NOTES |
This book was written for people consider entering into an intentional interim pastoral ministry, and for the congregation that will be using the service of one. The book dispels the notion that an interim is supposed to just keep things going until the regular install pastor arrives. An interim is to work on problems and make adjustments that is needed in the congregation so that any back lash or resentment will fall upon the interim and keep it from the new coming pastor. Even though a congregation might not "feel" like it is a good time for changes, it is an open and opportune time to do so. This note will list the five major tasks of an interim and the major characteristics (thus needs) of a congregation in an interim period. There are five major tasks during the interim period: (1) Come to terms with the congregation's history; (2) Discover a new identity; (3) Make Leadership Changes; (4) Renew ties with the Denomination; and (5) Commit to a new ministry. A congregation comes to terms with its history as it remembers and appreciates its past, from its founding to its present, looking for lessons, themes, strengths and weaknesses. It is a time when people express their feelings of loss, separation, hurt, disappointment, anger and guilt, and a time to access its accomplishments, current abilities and future potentialities. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Return to Top |
(2) A congregation discover a new vision as they recognize that they are always in a constant flux with changes in membership, surrounding community and pastors, as they connect their experiences and abilities with specific ministries and services, and as they give up fond memories of their past and start becoming excited about the future. (3) A congregation will have changes in leadership as a pastor leaves. Some leaders are burned out; others had stuck around out of loyalty to the pastor; some have had their feelings hurt; and others think it is time to let others come on board and have a chance at leadership. In a healthy congregation, such changes are expected and will occur smoothly, but in other congregations, power conflicts and despair of "filling the void" may occur. Finally, in some congregations, a staff member may need to be disciplined and let go--a problem the previous pastor was afraid to touch and which should not be left to the new coming pastor. (4) As a congregation gains understanding of whom they are and hope to become, it is also a good time to renew ties with the denomination and come to a greater understanding what it means to be affiliated with and recognized as a part of the denomination. (5) As the congregation becomes solidified and clear on where it is heading and has matched their needs and desires with a specific called ministry, the congregation is ready to say goodbye to the interim, welcome the new minister, and start a new chapter in its history. "Ideally, the end of the interim time will be a moment of celebration of what the journey has accomplished and of the congregation's readiness for a new beginning." |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Return to Top |
Characteristics of an Interim Congregation:
Interim congregations often have what might be called hidden agendas, serious issues of the past which have not been resolved. When kept underground, such issues tend to muddy the waters and seriously deter healthy congregational life. (p. 17).
Interim congregations often discover that their communication system is very inadequate, resulting in poor decision-making processes and in misunderstandings. A strong congregation is one in which all information is freely shared and all members are fully informed and aware of church matters. power struggles result when information is withheld as a means of controlling the organization. The interim time is a crucial opportunity for a congregation to examine its practices and ensure that an open system of communication and decision making is in place at the start of a new pastorate. (p. 22)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Return to Top |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Turn-Around Churches NOTES
|
This book by George Barna is the result of interviewing
thirty different churches from fourteen different denominations, which made
a successful turn-around from failing to succeeding, from being inward
focused and worried about dying to being outward focused and concerned about
mission. He gives a lot of useful information and encouragement to
churches that are attempting to make a turn-around themselves. In this
note, I give a list of general principles found throughout the book,
arranged under eight topics: commitment and relationships; the pastor;
education; worship; leadership; vision; mission; and structure. This listing
does not correspond with how they are presented in the book. For details and
amplification of the principles see the book itself. Regarding commitment and relationships:
Regarding the Pastor:
Regarding education:
Regarding worship:
Regarding leadership
Regarding vision:
Regarding mission:
Regarding structures:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Return to Top | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shaped by God's Heart NOTES
|
In Shaped by God’s Heart (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2004) Milfred Minatrea defines a “missional” church as “a reproducing community of authentic disciples, being equipped as missionaries sent by God, to live and proclaim His Kingdom in their world” (p. xvi). Missional churches are more concerned about “being and doing” mission instead of giving money for others to do mission. Every member is sent out weekly to be missionaries. In other words, they are not “mission minded” but rather “missional.” They are in the business of producing missionaries from among their own members to impact their community for God. They don’t regard missions as one ministry among many, but as the essence of their existence. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Four Passions,
Eight Actions
and
Nine Essential Practices |
The missional church has four passions, and each passion has two associated actions. The first passion is to love God. The two actions associated with loving God are to worship and to obey. The second passion is to live God’s mission, and its two actions are to serve and to share. The third passion is to love people, and its two actions are to embrace and to invite. The fourth passion is lead people to follow God, with the actions of equipping and empowering. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1. High-threshold Membership |
Missional churches have nine essential practices. The first is having a high-threshold membership, which makes a clear demarcation between believers and unbelievers, and which clearly defines what are expected of members and what members can expect from the church. Membership is considered a definite, personal and holy commitment, and not something that should be taken casually. Thus missional churches do not make membership automatic or easy. Members commit to work for the unity and the missions of the church. Thus all members know about and support the missions and vision of the church before joining and make their commitment to the goals of the church explicit (1 Corinthians 1:10). Members are committed not to their own ideas and comfort, but to the mission and the common good (1 Corinthians 10:24; 12:7) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2. Be real, not religious |
The second essential practice for missional churches is To be real, not religious. John Drane, in The MacDonaldization of the Church, writes “People are unlikely to be attracted to the church which, as they see it, has become a place with too much religion and too little spirituality . . . . [People want] an all-embracing reality that can give meaning to the whole of life” (Minatrea, quoted on p. 43-44). In other words, people are looking for authenticity in faith, in our interaction with one another, and in our actions in the world. They want to see congruity between what we say we believe and how we act with others and work in the world. Missional churches, therefore, expect members to live outside of the church the same as they act inside the church. They are called to be “living proof of a loving God to a watching world” [R. Lewis, The Church of Irresistible Influence (Zondervan: 2001) p 41, quoted by Minatrea p. 48]. In their interaction and work together, they recognize that people will make mistakes, and accidentally hurt one another’s feelings and cause messes. But missional churches accept mistakes as a natural part of life and are welcomed as signs of growth. They encourage experimentation and all attempts at doing something for God. Mistakes are a sign that people are at least making an attempt at doing and saying something, and are thus being active with their faith and interacting with others. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3. Teach to obey rather than to know |
The third essential missional practice is to teach to obey rather than to know. Missional churches teach both orthodoxy and orthopraxy. They teach what Christians are supposed to believe and do. “Faith possessed must become faith expressed if God’s purpose for each believer is to be realized” (p. 53). It is not what we know but how we live that counts. Members are taught scripture, theology, the core values of the church, critical thinking, the major spiritual disciplines, relationships, and cross-cultural interaction, using a variety of methods in order for all to know and obey the Word of God. Nothing is taught solely for information but rather for transformation, and to get people involved in mission and service projects. Various opportunities of mentoring and apprenticeships are also offered, as they continually seek to create new leaders and more areas of service for the community |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4. Rewrite worship every week |
The fourth essential missional practice is to rewrite worship every week. Missional churches believe worship should be an avenue for people to encounter God and grow in righteousness. Worship should affect our feelings and our understanding so that we are encouraged to leave the sanctuary and take action on behalf of God. Thus missional churches arrange worship services in such a way that the “form” is familiar but the “content” changes week to week. The primary driving image, idea or feeling of the worship service change week to week. Since Scripture speaks to the whole person in all areas of life, all emotions are legitimately touched in worship. In order to rewrite worship every week so that worship remains fresh and transformational, missional churches make God the focus of worship, make it experiential and participatory, focus upon content, not form, celebrate creativity, and go beyond words to use all the arts. The missional church also strives to utilize the maximum number of people possible to plan, prepare, prompt, and express worship. People are used, months in advance, to plan worship themes and sermon texts, write and rehearse dramatic presentations and video spots, create devotional guides that corresponds to the month’s planned worship services, plan music, and create visual displays. During the week, bulletin boards are set, audio-visual equipment is readied. During the worship service, various people are busy greeting people, showing hospitality, handing out worship programs, coffee and snacks, and various people are used to lead worship through its various elements. And after wards, others clean up, provide intercession and counseling, and make financial and statistical reports. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5. Live apostolically |
The fifth essential missional practice is to live apostolically. Apostles were sent out from the Church to go into the world to evangelize. They were neither maintaining nor living within the bounds of the church or of the world; they were trying to bridge the gap. To live apostolically, therefore, does not mean to take on the authority of the original apostles, nor does it mean we must recognize a line of succession for a leaders, but rather that we are to take upon ourselves the task of the apostles, that is, to proclaim, explain, convert and be an example of the joyful news of the presence and coming of the Kingdom of God. Members, then, do not spend all their time in the church, doing churchy stuff, but are sent out to live within the world, enjoy life, and witness to the joy of the Kingdom of God. Missional churches equip them to do so by showing appreciation for and dialoguing with culture, not succumbing to the mores of the world, and giving them discernment skills. To live apostolically means recognizing we are sent into the world, understanding that our world is now a post-modern and a neo-apostolic society, and sharing the good news. In other words, every believer is called to be an ambassador of Christ, to proclaim and reflect God’s glory by their lives. Missional churches carefully consider alternative images to present to the world. We need to counter-act the derision of religion and Christianity in particular, and present a joyful community that is not dependent upon drugs, profanity, hatred or sex. The emphasis here is upon “images,” for people are more open to meditate about an image, a good story, or a good movie, than they are to listen to a debate or read an editorial. Thus missional churches use the arts to prick the interest of and to raise questions in the minds of people in our society. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6. Expect to change the world |
The sixth essential missional practice is to expect to change the world. This expectation recognizes that God is the transformation business (Rom 12:2). “It is still God’s policy,” according to Tom Sine in The Mustard Seed Conspiracy, “to work through the embarrassingly insignificant to change his world and create his future” (p. 89). The problem is that we spend all our energies in maintaining our buildings and remaining safe and secure. We hold on rather than storm ahead; isolate ourselves from the world rather than engage in changing it; we look toward the eternal future and have little interest in the present (p. 90). We keep our eyes upon our own resources and abilities rather than the resurrecting and life-transforming power of the Holy Spirit. In contrast, missional churches expect to make changes in their communities, not change isolated and unconnected individuals, but also their work places, their clubs and recreational areas, their social communities and then the whole world. Missional churches, therefore, encourage relationships across social, economic and geographical barriers, concentrate on target audiences and at the same time seek to extend their influence throughout the world. Missional churches make definite plans in helping in leading others to Christ and into the Church, but also how to transform their own communities and touch others around the world. They carefully plan how to help and reach specific target groups and to care for those in need around the world. Missional churches, therefore, not only work in evangelism, but also in justice, peace-making, and relief ministries. They remind members that we live in a global society by:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7. Order actions according purpose |
The seventh essential missional practice is to order actions according to purpose. They are a “purpose-drive church.” § They know their purpose. § They check that actions are based upon purpose. § They let go of what does not serve their purpose. § They do only what serves their purpose. [The four bulleted points are taken directly from page 102.] |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8. Measure growth by capacity to release, not retain |
The eighth essential missional practice is to measure growth by capacity to release, not retain. The purpose of all living organisms is not to get bigger and bigger, but rather to reproduce. Missional churches, therefore, measure how well they are releasing people to serve Christ in the world. “They think first of extension, not enlargement; of releasing members in the power of God’s Spirit, not in retaining them” (p. 112). The missional church is more concerned about the effects of evangelism and the number of people they are helping, than the number of people who are registered as members of the congregation, the amount of revenue they are collecting, or how much prestige and power they have in the community. “The goal is to equip more people to live as authentic disciples of Jesus Christ. The measure has to do with function, not size. Enlargement is a by-product rather than the focus of growth in missional churches” (p. 112). | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9. Place Kingdom concerns first |
The ninth essential missional practice is to place kingdom concerns first. Missional churches follow the dictate of Matthew 6:33, “Seek ye first the kingdom of God and his righteousness.” The Kingdom of God is the rule of God in the midst of people, being manifested in righteousness, holiness, peace and wholeness. It is not the realm of God, but the rule of God over our choices, desires and actions, and thus is manifested in individuals and groups, and eventually throughout the whole earth when Jesus comes again. Missional churches are not therefore concerned about building their own empire, make their own congregation the largest in the area, but rather in getting people into The Church, into a congregation where they will feel comfortable, and can grow and serve. “They see themselves as only one battalion of a great kingdom force deployed on earth. Other Christians are brothers and sisters serving the same master. Although their affiliation might be with different denominations, they find their primary identity as part of the Kingdom. They distinguish between essentials and nonessentials in doctrinal interpretation, value and cooperate with Christians from other traditions in the Kingdom tasks, and join together in spiritual warfare against the enemy” (p. 129). Missional churches demonstrate the transforming power of the Kingdom by their own individual lives and as group, showing by acts of love and kindness, respect and space, that God is in their midst. They work with other Christians as a demonstration of unity, cooperation and service, throughout the world, over various denominations. They also demonstrate God’s transforming power in their lives by by being honest about their mistakes and asking for forgiveness. They seek to be transparent to one another so that they can help one another with their weaknesses and burdens. Finally being Kingdom citizens means to always be in the business of inviting others to join the fellowship and become a vital part of the Kingdom of God. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pastoral Leadership |
Beyond these four over-arching passions, eight actions, and nine practices, Milfred Minatrea also writes about congregational structures, vision casting, leadership essentials, risk taking, and change management. He cautions that there has to be a match to what the congregation wants and needs to that of the senior pastor or else there will be great frustration. For example, in the situation where a congregation has a pastor who is more of a manager than a visionary and the congregation wants change, the church will become frustrated with the pastor’s lack of vision and the lack of any bold initiatives. Where the congregation is more conventional and wants to maintain the status quo and has a pastor who is a manager, there is a match. The primary focus in this case is on pastoral care and the continuation of existing programs and keeping the existing membership. In the situation where the congregation is conventional but the pastor is visionary, then the pastor will be frustrated and complain that the church has no real purpose, no vision and won’t change. Finally, in the situation where the congregation and the pastor are both missional minded then there is a match and a “desire to pursue God’s next missional challenge” (p. 171). So before changing a congregation to becoming more missional, it is important to assess how ready the congregation is as well as to discern the desire and leadership skills of the pastor. It is possible for a leader to learn skills that is necessary, but only if the desire and vision exists. In mismatched cases, the leadership must determine if they need to call a new pastor, provide further training and increase the leadership skills of the existing pastor, or to form a new congregation from the midst of the existing congregation. If a new church will be formed, make sure support, blessings and encouragement is given to the missional group; in other words, making a cordial and planned split with everybody’ being blessed and no one blaming or being resentful of the others. Nevertheless, change will still have to be managed. People are still going to feel threatened with the loss of some friends, and the eventual necessity of meeting in a different location, and the struggle of birthing something new. There is sorrow and worry for all in saying goodbye and starting a new epoch in the congregation’s life. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[Note a detailed expanded PowerPoint presentation along with teacher and student notes on this book, entitled, "Passions, Actions, and Practices of a Missional Church" can be requested from Chuck. Just email him a request.] |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hit the Bullseye
NOTES |
Paul Borden, in his book Hit the Bullseye (Abingdon Press: 2003) explains how he, as the Executive Pastor turned around the northwestern American Baptist region of churches. Within a five-year period they experienced remarkable growth:
He orchestrated this change through radical and strong leadership, pushing the congregations to be outwardly focused and make evangelism their top priority, and either trained or brought in pastors as active change agents and missionaries, not managers, who would not be stifled by bureaucracy nor side-tracked by uninformed laity. He explains Leaders should be training congregations to expect health and growth. Congregations should be upset when a year goes by if conversion and baptisms decrease. The church exists for others, and when others stop coming and cease experiencing eternal changes, congregations should start asking their leaders why they continue to meet, since their purpose for meeting is not being realized (p. 142).
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Return to Top | This note will briefly cover his three basic principles, three paradigms that hinder church growth, the general work of the regional staff, the necessity of going beyond friendliness, and a call for evangelism. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Basic Principles |
The basic principles behind the regional office strategies and tactics were: “1. Fruitfulness is as important as faithfulness. “2. What we count we value. “3. Accountability is a basic requirement for change and must be based upon objective measurement” (p. 37). These principles had the regional judicatory to quit acting like chaplains to the pastors and started acting like consultants who trained pastors on how to lead and evangelize. They demanded growth from all the pastors and congregations they helped, and protected the pastor from those who would try to stop the change process. In order to accomplish this, regional staff were no longer required to visit every pastor and congregation each year, but were required to prove that congregations were growing by their work with specific congregations. To help regional staff to become measurable change agents, the regional office bought books, CDs and tapes on leadership, the change process and congregational revitalization. They were also sent to seminars, and staff meetings were partially devoted to further training, along with reporting on how things were progressing with consultations. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Paradigms that Hinders Growth
SHEPHERD
|
Paul Borden mentions three paradigms that greatly hindered congregational growth: (1) seeing the pastor as a “shepherd”; (2) understanding the congregation as an extended “family”; and (3) having a “small-church” mentality and structure. Even though the pastor is indeed called to act like a shepherd, we have romanticized the role of shepherd and reduced the shepherd’s job to protection and care. We forget that a shepherd eats some of the sheep, sheared the flock, occasionally broke a leg to keep a lamb from wondering away and force it to bond with the shepherd, leads the flock through difficult terrain to good food and water and then back out again through difficult terrain to find new sources of food, and in the biblical model, shepherds also sacrificed some sheep to God. We forget that even though the shepherd leads the flock to green grass and still waters, it is still the responsibility of the sheep to feed and drink for themselves. They are not bottle fed all the time. We ignore the fact that the sheep existed for the benefit of the shepherd, not the shepherd for the sheep. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CHAPLAIN OR LEADER? |
Paul explains that the “pastor” model turns ministers into “chaplains” and hinders them from actually leading and making changes in the congregational system. When consulting with congregations, the regional staff explained that having the pastor concentrate on caring for people and helping maintain harmony among the sheep is quite limiting in terms of the number of people that can be ministered to by one person. We also demonstrated that such mentality drives away others who are not attracted by this model, thus leaving the group often ministering to only very needy and co-dependent people (p. 71). Paul also points out that what we normally consider as “pastoral care,” that is “feeding, caring, serving and meeting the needs of the sheep” is not, according to Ephesians 4:10ff, the job of the pastor, but rather the role of the sheep (p. 21). Therefore, Paul suggests we quit calling ordained ministers “pastors,” and start calling them “leaders.” Similarly, we should replace “pastoral care” with “congregational care” (p. 22-23). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FAMILY |
The second controlling paradigm that hinders congregational growth is viewing the church as “family.” Although scripture repeatedly uses the family metaphor and commands mutual commitment, love and care for one another, our understanding of family today detracts from having a mission and service mentality. It insolates us from “the outsiders” and causes us to concentrate on serving family members. It keeps us from holding one another accountable for our actions and allows for mediocrity to flourish in order to protect interpersonal relationships and feelings. “One reason we are often unwilling to create specific goals and measures of effectiveness,” Paul Borden writes, “is that we know that many in our ‘family’ will not measure up” (p. 24). The family metaphor also promotes clerical tenure, so that pastors who make the family feel good and have spent a long time with the family are allowed to stay as the pastor even when all ministry effectiveness has gone. Finally, the metaphor often divides the kingdom of God into various competing family groups. We don’t work for God and the spread of the Kingdom of God throughout the world among all peoples, but rather only for “our own kind of family.” |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ARMY |
Borden notes that families were never supposed to be a controlling metaphor for church ministries and services. Instead we are supposed to be like an army, “with Jesus Christ, our leader, who attacks the stronghold of Satan” (p. 23). Solders are committed and dependant upon one another in order to stand against a common enemy and to accomplish common goals. Relationships and feelings are secondary to the mission. “Our current concept of family ends at care, with too little thought of what the group will accomplish. Today we see the family promoting individual accomplishment rather than both individual and group accomplishment” (p. 24). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PROFESSIONAL SPORTS TEAM |
A better metaphor for us today would be a “professional sports team.” A good team has great camaraderie and helps one another on and off the field—they build and maintain a sense of family, but each one is held accountable for their respective tasks and the goal of winning is never lost. Individual feelings are set aside for the good of the team. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SMALL-CHURCH MENTALITY |
The third controlling paradigm that hinders congregational growth is having a small-church mentality. Without going into detail, I list various aspects of what this means according to Paul Borden:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Work of the Regional Staff |
The regional staff worked with congregations in discovering a full and realistic view of themselves and then developing a vision for their future. They had them compile and then continue to report statistics on worship attendance, monies collected, money sent to missions, how affective their evangelism efforts were, how many new leaders were being developed during the year, how many new small groups were formed, how many visitors attended and what percentage of those visitors became active disciples within the congregation. The purpose of reporting all these statistics were to demonstrate that the judicatory regarding these things as important and it was hoped that by measuring these things, they would become important to the congregations as well. “What we count we value” (p. 39). Regional staff helped the congregation develop a unique vision for themselves. “This vision needs to be big enough to stir the blood, specific enough to be accomplished, and short enough to be put on a bumper sticker” (p. 66). Vision was stated in such a way that it gave a picture of not only how the congregation would be different but also how the surrounding community would be changed as well. Once a specific vision was create, it was communicated often, “presented as an option to the status quo,” and presented as a realistic goal. The executive pastor was encouraged to be the keeper, caster, persuader and teacher of the vision. He was coached to protect his time so that he could meditate on and expand the vision, by concentrating his work with key leaders, preaching, and applying the vision to all the church’s teachings. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Being Friendly is not enough |
One of the most revolutionary thoughts I found from the book was demonstrating that the goal of being friendly is inadequate. Instead, the congregation should strive to be a place where new friends are made. “Generally people become Jesus’ disciples through relationships with people who are already his disciples. This means that a healthy, growing congregation is always forming new groups so that new people can develop new relationships with disciples already in the congregation” (p. 91). This simple change, from being a friendly place, to being a place where new friends are made will radically change the congregation’s values, goals and programming. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
See a powerful and active Jesus |
Another point in bringing about a turnaround in congregations was to give them a different understanding of Jesus. Instead of seeing Jesus as the crucified one, the good shepherd, or the one who blesses little children, churches need to see the resurrected, powerful, glorious Jesus of Revelation 1:12–16. It is the powerful, all-knowing, strong and purposeful King of King that, according to Borden, will inspire congregations to change and push through the difficulties (p. 137). This Jesus will not only hold them accountable and reward them for their work, but has all the resources available to help them accomplish the mission he himself has sent them on. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Return to Top |
Let me end with Paul Borden’s call for urgency in evangelizing the world and making disciples of Christ. First, Borden notes that the Great Commission and the Great Commandment do not have equal status. The Great Commission must have priority. “When a congregation states it has two equal purposes, it will usually gravitate to the one that is easiest to achieve and as a result turn inward” (p. 92). Believers will have all of eternity to worship God and Jesus Christ. Believers for eternity will be able to fellowship with their Lord and other Christians. We will have the eternal opportunity to sit at the feet of Jesus Christ and be taught. However, our God has only given us one lifetime to make disciples for Jesus Christ. Congregations that focus on worship, fellowship, and teaching often reflect groups that have lost a sense of urgency (p. 138).
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Leadership and the New Science NOTES
|
Margaret
Wheatley, a management consultant, interacts with concepts from Quantum
Physics, Field Theory and Chaos Theory to challenge our concepts of managing
people and organizations as if they were like machines (Newtonian Physics)
and start seeing them as interrelated, interactive systems where individuals
cannot be seen in isolation from the system, where change is expected and
welcomed, and where information and relationships are everything.
Although she does not specifically mention church management, she does have
a lot to say that is applicable. She explains concepts, but previous
knowledge of the sciences involved and of system's thinking, will make reading
and applying the book easier.
1. From the biological and ecological sciences, she notes that living organisms and systems such as streams, are always changing and adapting. When major stresses affect the organism, or when the environment changes, they do not marshal all of their resources to remain the same, but rather adapt. A new order emerges, yet at the same time, remains true to itself and function. A beach is still a recognizable beach, before and after a hurricane. A finch is still a finch, even if adapted to radically different islands (micro-evolution). In this way, dissipative structures demonstrate that disorder can be a source of new order, and that growth appears from disequilibrium, not balance. The things we fear most in organizations--disruptions, confusion, chaos--need not be interpreted as signs that we are about to be destroyed. Instead, these conditions are necessary to awaken creativity. (P. 21). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Return to Top |
Thus when we enter those chaotic times, we should not become fearful that we are dying, but rather we should look forward that something new is emerging. If we know who we are, have common values, maintain our inter-connectivity with one another and with our environment, and quit striving to maintain the old ways, we will become stronger and better. (These are points, she makes repeatedly throughout the book.) 2. Quantum physics speaks about how subatomic particles are interrelated and still interact with one another even though being vastly distant from one another, how accurate prediction is impossible, how the perspective of an observer changes the data one collects and the conclusions reached, and how it is impossible to control all aspects of a system. Simple prediction and replication are impossible, so instead of making minute plans and overly worrying about organizational structures, managers should rather be concerned about "strategic thinking," where people know the group's intent, purpose, identity and values, so that they can make proper reactions and maintain good relationships. Relationships within and without the organization, and the cooperation and involvement of people, are more important than structure and lines of authority. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Return to Top |
Quantum physics also notes that small changes, and seemingly insignificant interactions, can affect the whole system. By the very act of being observed, the system is changed. A butterfly in Mexico affects the hurricane forming off the coast of Africa. Thus just by asking questions of people, or working with just a few people, the system can be affected. I don't personally spend time any more on elaborate plans or time lines. I want to use the time formerly spent on detailed planning and analysis to create the organizational conditions for people to set a clear intent, to agree on how they are going to work together, and then practice to become better observers, learners, and colleagues as they co-create with their environment. And I have learned that great things are possible when we increase participation. I always want more people, from more diverse functions and places, to b there. (P.46.) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Return to Top |
3. From field theory, we learn that there are invisible fields of energy that influences our behavior, for example, gravity, a store's feeling of opening and fun, or exclusive prestige and power, a church's feeling holiness. Whereas such fields cannot be seen, and are at times hard to describe, human organizations mold and create their own fields through their collective culture, values, vision and ethics. This means that as we observe various behavior, we need to be asking what culture and value they represent, and ask if that is consistent with what we want to be and project to others. It is important that we walk our talk, and if we want to change or improve our organization's field of influence and energy, we must be clear on who and why we are, make sure that identity is always in the forefront and understandable by everyone, and be congruent to it. Interpersonal fields are created and shared by groups of people, and thus must emerge from within the group. A leader cannot impose a vision and change the field of energy, but a leader can slowly affect and help mold the field. Leaders are to help people graciously and lovingly see how actions are contrary to the stated and shared vision of the group, and to always expand and explain the vision; in other words, discipline, forgiveness, and mutual support. This work requires awareness, patience, and generosity. Behaviors don't change just by announcing new values. We move only gradually into being able to act congruently with those values. ... we have to be more self-reflective ... help one another notice when we fall back into old behaviors. ... The leader's task is first to embody these principles, and then to help the organization become the standard it has declared for itself. (p. 130). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Return to Top | 4. From biology, we learn that living organisms are best seen as having consistent internal information with varying and changing outward physical forms. A caterpillar and a moth are the same organism in two varied distinct physical forms. The more information an organism can process, understand and use the smarter it is, and the more likely it is to survive. In other words, information is everything. It is the constant basis of existence (our "in-formation") and of continual existence, as well as being the source of creativity and growth. Thus management should not be putting a "chastity belt" upon the organization, withholding and controlling information, but rather finding ways to increase the flow and understanding of information. Instead of seeing "information as power," that needs to be controlled; we need to see "information as nourishment," that is "essential to everyone" (p. 101). Since we mold and distort information by our own perception, it is important for cross fertilization and group process in interpreting and acting upon information. It is important to build teams and create a team spirit. "Anything that supports reflective conversations among new and different parts of the organization is important, including architectural spaces for informal exchanges and dedicated time in meetings" (p. 108). | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Return to Top |
5. Chaos theory demonstrates that what might seem, at a single point of time, chaotic and without order, is orderly, when viewed over a period of time. "Strange attractors" can be recognized so that even though a system cannot be predicted, it still nevertheless, acting from within a consistent inward order. There is a pattern within a pattern that is demonstrated across the system. Thus when we look at an organization or interpersonal problem, we need to be asking if the problem is reflective of a repeating pattern. The problem, though, is that such recurring behaviors, themes and patterns, don't normally show up at close range, while in the midst of a problem. They only so up when looking over a period of time, and sometimes only as reflection is done with a person from outside of the system. Leadership needs to find ways to help develop strange attractors that lead to wholeness and growth, and able to survive chaotic times, and that is done by developing meaning and values in the organization. ... I have witnessed the incredible levels of energy and passion that can be evoked when leaders or colleagues take the time to recall people to the meaning of their work. It only takes a simple but powerful question: "What called you here? What were you dreaming you might accomplish when you first came to work here?" This question always elicits a deep response because so few of us work for trivial purposes. Most people come ... with a desire to do something meaningful, to contribute and serve. (P. 132-3.) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6. A system gets into trouble when relationships break down, when information is lacking, when it is unclear on its identity, goals, vision or values, and when contributions and ideas from others are being ignored. When in trouble, the organization needs to get in touch with itself, through group process and interaction, looking at three major areas, identity, information and relationships, while paying attention to feelings, perceptions and desires. The first major step is to discover what excites people, and what they deem is meaningful. Then to explore how their deepest desires and purposes may work together, or against, one another, and finally, to pursue if a new meaning and changes are available and desirable. We must step back from the presenting issues and explore together our aspirations, purposes and values. We must develop a curiosity on what makes the other tick. What are their hopes and fears? Then we can once again see one another as colleagues, not as enemies, and "we might discover common issues and problems we both deem significant" (p. 151). Then we might decide it is worth adapting and changing to mutually support one another. If we engage in such a process, and if we help just a few people within the system become clearer on who they are and why they have joined and work in an organization, we will affect the whole system. In other words, "'preaching to the choir' is the right thing to do" (p. 151). They will become energized, and more able and willing to voice and explain their purpose, which will in turn affect others around them. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Return to Top |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kicking Habits NOTES: |
Thomas Bandy wants to help dying churches make radical systemic changes by showing where they are addicted to bad habits and ways of thinking. Although I believe he has overstated his case at times, I found his work challenging, informative and encouraging. He not only shows problem areas but also suggests how to bring about change. I've taken most of his points and made a list of polarities. Read through the list below and see how much to the left, middle or right your church is between each of the 43 polarities. If your church is primarily or all the way on the left side of a polarity, score a 1; mostly on the left, 2; if balanced between the two, 3; mostly right, 4; and all the way on the right, 5. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Return to Top |
Total your score. The least amount you can score (every answer on the left side) is 43; if every answer was balanced, in the middle, 129; and the highest possible score is 215. According to Bandy, the larger the score, the more likely the church is healthy and growing. In other words, a church wants to be able to answer each polarity either in the center or to the right. The more answers fall in the left side, ones and twos, the more problems the church will have in reaching our post-modern society. [For an Excel, printable version of these polarities, see Bandy Polarities.xls.] Bandy has many interesting things to say; for example, youth groups fail, not because there is bad leadership or programming, but rather, because the 18 - 40 year old members are not enthusiastic about and encouraged in their own spirituality. In other words, the future of the church is not the youth, but rather the young adults. He encourages church to play down and stream line bureaucracy, management and financial concerns, so that ministries can evolve and be able to meet timely needs in the community, and so that the church board (elders) can be more involved in ministries and spiritual growth. When the board starts to work on a new vision or explore new ways to minister to the community, people on the fringes should be involved. Get the elders to go on a retreat along with people who are inactive, or who are not members. Go out and ask people what they think of the church and what they need to help them be whole, healthy and mature. Listen to the people who are expected to get the most out of a ministry. I especially enjoyed his emphasis that each ministry should be based upon need, desire and excellence. Ministries develop through people's gifts and passions, and are only released to perform the ministry only after being trained. Whenever a ministry idea is suggested, the response should not be a question of money, but rather does it fit in with the ethos of the church and what can the church do to support the person, or people, who want to perform the ministry. Bandy wants each and every group of the church to be a PALS group: Praying; Active in some for of "hands-on" ministry; Learning from the Bible as well as ways to improve their ministry abilities; and Sharing their faith. Although eventually Bandy would have us do away with standing committees, he does suggest that through an interim period, they be transformed into a PALS group as well, and then be given freedom to develop into a specific action and task force. As groups go out to minister, they realize that their mission is incomplete unless they explain their motivation and why they are working. Thus ministry and service is explicitly tied to evangelism, and no group is released from the obligation to share their faith by saying their actions speak louder than their words. Actions and words must go together. People, especially the leaders, must be sharing Jesus with others. Thus leaders are ready to share their faith in an authentic, natural manner, using their own terminology, illustrations, and examples, so that "outsiders" can understand. As groups split into various, ever-changing and adapting ministries, the church is unified by a common commitment to a vision and a value system, as well as attendance in worship. Continuous communication through various means is also important, but primarily people are motivated, connected and informed on what is happening at worship so that to miss a Sunday is to miss out. People in general, and leaders specifically, have a deep desire to come and check out on ways God is acting in their community. Bandy warns that any church that seeks to transform itself into this type of ministry and leadership model, will experience much resistance, stress and conflict. It will not be something a church can do over night. A vision must swell up and over take the people and then the structure can be changed. I highly recommend the book to any church that wants to take steps in stopping their decline and who has the courage and faith to become unstuck from its past heritage and traditions and are desirous of becoming new. It would be nice to work with a group who wants to at least keep the polarities in my list in balance, and then to start to tilt them to the right. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Return to Top | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Christianity Beyond Belief NOTES |
According to Todd Hunter’s book, Christianity Beyond Belief, Following Jesus for the Sake of Others (IVP: 2009), the problem with much of American Christianity in today’s world is that the message has been reduced to “me and Jesus” and a joyful time far in the future, beyond time, after the rapture. We overly concentrate on the saving death and resurrection of Jesus, and often ignore the exciting transformative journey with other believers, who are engaged in a world-transforming enterprise. Instead of forcing people to face death and God’s judgment, Todd encourages us to get people to consider living in the here and now. He wants us to recognize that we are created to live a very long time—eternally. Thus we need to ask ourselves and others, “If we know we will live a very long time, what will we do differently?” “Who will we follow?” “Around what narrative would we organize the various aspects of our lives?” (p. 25). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Christian Story |
According to Todd, modern Christianity has been living a truncated narrative. The story ignores the beginning, jumps to the middle, talks about our sin and the need for Jesus, and then quickly moves to the second coming of Jesus and the final judgment. We concentrate on the needs of individuals, and present Christianity as an individualistic response for those needs. Thus, people have forgotten, or never learned, why God created the world and don’t understand that we are entering into an ongoing living story of God. We are not allowing the community of God and all of its story to develop and shape us. The story of God’s people begins with the creation of Adam and Eve, who made to enjoy the presence of God, living under God’s direction, and as a couple and family begin to transform the world. They were to re-create God’s creation. Instead, they sought their own way and brought disorder, destruction, blame, and alienation into the world. God then called Abraham to be the founding father of a new community of faith with the purpose of living in the presence of God and transforming the world. But Israel became more concerned about being a nation at ease, with affluence and political influence, and thereby turned away from being a spiritual light unto the nations. They departed from the ways of God to follow the ways of other nations. They neglected God’s call to reshape the whole world through righteousness, justice, and holiness. Jesus then came into the world to gather a new community around him, who be shaped by the love and grace of God and make a difference to those around them. They became friends of sinners, cast out demons, healed sickness and disease, and modeled and proclaimed a new meta-narrative to their neighbors. Although no perfect in living out their ideals, they nevertheless existed for others, not for themselves. After Jesus’ death and resurrection, Jesus commissioned all of his followers to go and transform the world, starting from Jerusalem, and then extending out to Judea, Samaria, and the outermost ends of the world. The followers of Jesus were to make a difference to the people around them, and thereby slowly trans-form the whole world according to God’s loving way and rule. They were to actively and joyfully involve themselves in the affairs of the world, and the needs of others, so that the community of God could grow, and so that others would experience the new, life-affirming, and life-giving community of wholeness. By their life together, others would discover a new way of living, a new narrative to direct their thoughts and actions, and a new way for transformation. When the new world and new heavens are created, we will be resurrected and given new physical human bodies, and again we will have the same responsibility to be a community to help one another learn about, re-create, and re–create in the world. In other words, to be a transformative community in the new cosmos. The story of God’s people, then, has been, and will always be, a united people, called out from the individualistic and destructive ways of the fallen world, to live under the direction and love of God, existing to demonstrate, extend, and manifest the kingdom of God, for the benefit of others and the glory and honor to God.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This means the Church is created and governed by the calling and sending activity of God. . . . Church is a community of people created by the kingdom of God, which is the expressed intent of God, his rule and reign. Local churches—gatherings of Christ’s followers—exist as outposts of God’s kingdom agenda. It’s really that simple. And the devil is not in the details. The devil is in the wrong story, which produces a wrong mental picture and wrong pattern for church life (pgs 67 & 69).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Four Points that explain the Christian Life |
Todd succinctly explains the ongoing story of Christian life with four major points: “God intends for the followers of Jesus to be his (1) cooperative friends (2) seeking to live in creative goodness (3) for the sake of others (4) through the power of the Holy Spirit” (p. 76). His book explains, amplifies, illustrates, and gives scriptural references for these four points. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cooperative Friends |
Jesus calls
us friends (Jn 15:14f) to be involved in God’s business (Mt 28:18ff). “In
this com-mission Jesus is commending us to cooperate with God in bringing
our broken world into alignment with his purpose for creation” (p. 79). We
do this by introducing people to Jesus and the community which is formed
around Jesus, and by training others on how to follow Jesus, how to be
integral members of the community, and how to use their interests and
abilities in service for God for the benefit of others. Such training, though, is a life-long, ongoing process, not a once-in-a-lifetime decision or a single discipleship course to master. It is a way of life. It is purposefully preparing and acting as an ambassador of God, not to manipulate people into making a decision for Christ, but in order to introduce others to a better all-encompassing meta-story and community. We need to be friends for others, purposefully and thoughtfully speak and act as friends of God so that others can become friends of God.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Creative goodness for the sake of others |
Although we
might need to sometimes convey logical, well-reasoned reasons for our
faith, Todd has found it is more effective in evangelism to creatively
present and bring about goodness and joy in the lives of others before
verbally witnessing to them. We need to help others experience goodness,
and then present the good news of the overwhelming goodness of God.
Instead of angrily wielding a sword to cut out evil and force others to
listen, we should think of wrapping a towel around our waist to serve
others. We are to “image a moral life rooted in positive love rather than
unenthusiastic prohibitions” (p. 123). In other words, we are to genuinely
embody love (p. 145). (See Isaiah 58:6–7 & 9–12; Mt 25:35f.) We are to
keep our “eyes open for any creative way to notice and serve others.
Sometimes this leads to spiritual encounters, sometimes it doesn’t” (p.
97). Exhibiting an servant lifestyle helps us be agents of God. It brings pleasure to God, is a blessing to others, and it pulls the best out of us. We feel fully alive, fully human. This kind of life is good for us. In it we become most human—truly us. We are fully human while expressing constant goodness on behalf of others. This story sets the trajectory for our eternal destiny and undying cosmic role (p. 102).
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Through the power of the Holy Spirit
|
We cannot be
cooperative friends of God, and live in creative goodness for the sake of
others by our own efforts. We need the power, presence, and direction of
God within us. We need the Holy Spirit. The Spirit empowers us for a purpose, not to give individuals experiences of pleasure and joy, nor to make people feel important or holy, but rather to develop communion with God, bring wholeness to the community of God, and extend life to others. The Holy Spirit helps us help others. Without an outlet, without a focus on others, life in the Spirit becomes stale. It has no power to create life in others. At some point such a life actually stops being “in the Spirit” because life in the Spirit, by definition, means giving life to others” (p. 141). We need to be “animated, energized and guided by the power of the Holy Spirit.” On the one hand, we should not ignore the Spirit, nor reduce him to a theological cipher; but on the other hand, we should not become overly emotional or exhibit bizarre behavior. We need to live out of an understanding of having the holiness, power, and presence of God within us, making us temples, priests, and ambassadors of God. We need to put our faith in action, speak up, be involve, and assist others, with the blessing, power, and authority of God within us, according to the leading of the Holy Spirit. We need the knowledge that God has sent us out, and also the experience of being sent out on a daily basis by the Holy Spirit.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Five steps in walking in the Spirit |
Todd Hunter gives five steps in walking out in faith under the leadership of the Spirit. First, we need to be open to divine appointments with others by being involved with others and listening to them. Second, after carefully listening to and being with others, we seek to discern what is gong on in the other person’s life and spiritual journey. Third, we discern what the Spirit want us to do at that moment with and for the other. Fourth, we act: “give a word of comfort or wisdom, say a prayer, lend a hand or whatever is appropriate” (p. 139–140). Fifth, check in with the other person. Ask what the other is feeling and thinking, and in conversation with the Spirit, ask yourself, “What should this person—or both of us—do now?” (p. 140).
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Golden Triangle of Presence |
In other words, we are to constantly keep a conversation going with our own selves, God, and others. We seek to be open to, aware of, and interact with our own selves, God, and others. This is what Todd calls the “Golden Triangle of Presence” (p. 105–106). Life energized by and animated through the power of the Spirit is attractive to today’s seekers. They want to know God and his power. Mere mental assent to doctrine will never do. They want to experience God; indeed, all of us want to feel linked to God, merged into an alliance that results in changed life. . . . Through God’s full story, seekers will know they have indeed found and connected to God. The person and work of the Holy Spirit has another important practical application for contemporary seekers. They often prefer to learn new truths experientially. This is how they know something is real. It is common today to hear that someone came to faith because he or she sensed the presence of God, witnessed the healing of a friend or was touched by God in some way. When the work of the Spirit is active in a community of faith, seekers hear a language they understand and value. (Pg. 141–142.)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T.I.E. Groups |
Finally, Todd Hunter ends his book with a simple way to implement the ideas in his book: be involved in a TIE Group—a “Three is Enough Group.” This is a weekly transformational group of three friends doing three simple things: pray, read, and serve. (1) They pray together to be alert to the Spirit’s leadership and guidance. (2) They grow in faith by reading and mediating on God’s word and on other good texts on the spiritual journey. (3) They serve others by being alert, by noting others through creative, resourceful and inventive help. Serve others by being humble, gentle, generous and genuinely altruistic—we do not draw attention to ourselves or our TIE group . . . we start looking for small but meaningful ways to serve our community” (p. 160).
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Return to Top | Todd Hunter’s Christianity Beyond Belief would be a good book for a TIE group, a Sunday school class, or a small group to study. I highly recommend this book for all Christians. It is easy to understand, has many good stories and illustrations, amply based upon scripture, and provides good discussion questions. It also has an appendix of verses taken from The Message that highlight the Christian lifestyle that he envisions: being cooperative friends of Jesus, living in creative goodness, for the sake of others, through the power of the Holy Spirit. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Turn Your Church Inside Out NOTES |
In 1978
Walt Kallestad was called to be the "chaplain" for the Community
Church of Joy, Glendale, Arizona, which was founded in 1974, had 260 members,
with average worship attendance of only 90. He was hired to direct the programs,
care for the sick, and visit in the homes—to stay close and available
for the beck and call of the church's members and to make them feel good.
The church was inward focused, and he was uncomfortable with it.
He didn't want to get rid of the meeting the true spiritual needs of members, or cease celebrating and encouraging members. Church members have legitimate needs, and it is legitimate for the church to tend to them. It is illegitimate, however, when caring for church members becomes an end in itself, the primary reason for the church's existence (11). Thus he set out to wondering what it would mean, in all areas of the church, to be other centered. He started to pray about it, talk to community leaders, non-members, unbelievers and the marginalized. He started pushing the church leadership toward that direction, and purposely decided not to meet all the expectations the congregation had had of him. In the first few years, 25% of the membership left, but 40% more came. After six years of "wondering," they started to make programmatic and definite changes, and after following that path for twelve more years, the church had to moved to a 200-acre campus with more than 10,000 people calling themselves members, from 3,000 to 5,000 gathering for celebratory worship each weekend; and over 10,000 gathering for special celebratory services. Tens of thousands of both paid and volunteer hours and millions of dollars in mission-focused resources are spent each year as we respond to the larger community's hunger for God (14). This book tells how the church evolved, and gives principles that any church can use to also become a church for others. Following his advice does not guarantee the same results, neither will it mean a church will come up with the same programming and look, but it will mean they will be more mission and evangelism centered. They will be growing, in all aspects of that word, and thus, be more pleasing to God. Their nine guiding principles of a church for others are: Cheer for others. Express nonjudgmental love for others. Listen wholeheartedly to others. Encourage others. Build authentic relationships with others. Receive the gifts of others. Appreciate others. Treat others with kindness. Energize others with grace. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Return to Top |
Kallestad acknowledges that changing
worship is one of the hardest areas to change, because it causes so much
grief from long-time members.
But not changing worship may be playing with a worse fire. To insist that nothing in worship be change, to insist that we keep on doing what we have always done, is finally to reduce worship to magic, to the un-Christian belief that "correct" forms, rituals and words will somehow compel God to be present "for us" (72). Finding the exact forms, words, music, style and images to use in worship will be determined by the expected visitors who will be attending. Worship leaders must talk with the "others" to see what works and does not work. There is no one answer on creating a worship service for the benefit of others, because people differ in each locality. It may be liturgical, utilize country-western music, or flow like a talk/host television show. Worship needs to use the language, music and images of the participants, so as to be stimulating (dare we say "entertaining"?), not boring, and engaging "people at many different sensory and intellectual levels" (73). In worship people encounter God, and God encounters them. In that encounter, faithful people will be nurtured and those without faith will be evangelized. If worship is about encounter, then the distinction between so-called seekers' worship and believers' worship is a false one (74). Since worship is seeking to bring about an encounter between participants and God, it is not designed to be a time of in-depth study. Purposeful times of discipleship and development of the proper practices and correct understanding of the faith come through small-group experiences, written, audio and video resources, retreats, classes and seminars. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Principles of Worship |
Kallestad gives other principles of worship, with others in mind:
Those on the edges of faith who cross the threshold into our churches must be able to take something with them when they re-cross the threshold back to the parking lot. An experience, a thought, a feeling, a practice that flows from having encountered God as they are, who they are, and where they are. When this happens, people return because they can't stay away (p. 82).
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Return to Top | The book also teaches about praying
for others, evangelizing and ministering for others, money in a church for
others, staffing a church for others, and ends with how to manage change
in a church for others.
A community exists because of common commitments, common beliefs, common values, and a common vision of what the well-being of all looks like. When commitments, beliefs, values, and vision are not largely and reasonably held in common, communities fragment, conflict erupts, and mission gets lost in squabbling. It is essential to keep in mind at all times that you are building a community, and community building has to do with consensus building. It is more than worth the time and effort it takes to bring people along and gain their ownership of the vision. If you only work with those who immediately catch the vision, you will tear down community rather than build it. Again, patience, staying the course, is extremely important. Thus Kallestad recommends great praying, careful planning, and patiently getting the leadership of the church on board, starting with the pastor(s) and then moving out to the staff, official leaders, key leaders, and the committees and groups within the church. Throughout the process, leadership is expected to model the values, ministries and actions toward which the church is moving. Other principles of change include:
The watchword of leaders is:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Return to Top |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Polarity Management NOTES |
Dr. Barry Johnson wants
managers to be able to distinguish between "problems to be solved"
and "polarities to be managed." A problem is something that has
a solution and an ending, like fixing a broken machine, or making an either/or
decision. A polarity is an ongoing process between two interdependent
contrasting poles, or emphases, that creates tension and energy for the
system. Some examples of polarities are:
Each pole has positive and negative attributes associated with them, and each pole is interdependent upon one another. One cannot exist without the other. A system will experience problems associated with both poles, if only one pole continues to be emphasized over a long period of time. The interrelationship of the polarities can be charted in a square with positive aspects of each pole (left side and right side) listed on the top, and negative aspects on the bottom.
When people start to experience the problems of one of the polarities (L-), they sometimes mistakenly believe that the strengths of the opposite pole (R+) is the solution to all their problems. When the move to the new pole, they eventually will experience problems associated with that pole (R-), and perceive their solution is the opposite (L+). Yet after awhile, similar or the same problems they started with will come back (L-), and people will clamor to push for the opposite once again (R+). This is a continual and natural process of groups. The goal of polarity management is to keep the system in the upper quadrants as long as possible, and the transitions through the lower quadrants as short as possible. In other words, try to get the system to enjoy the positives of both polarities and to keep them in balance. When one pole is getting too much emphasis, shift to the other. In managing a polarity, it is important to get everyone involved to see the complete picture. They need to see the positives and negatives of both sides. This can be done by filling out a polarity chart and get people to agree exactly what the issues and poles are. For example, a church that is arguing about keeping things as they always have been, or making radical changes to reach out to the younger generation, might create a Stability/ Change Polarity Chart: Click on the chart above for an animated version. Permission granted to download and use the animated pif, if acknowledgement given to its creator. Next they can come to agreement which quadrant the church is currently in, and perhaps chart the history of the church as having cycled through the quadrants a couple of times in the past. Then people can discuss how to proceed to get the best of the upper quadrants. Yet also noting, that to continue to stay stuck in one quadrant, perhaps L+, will eventually produce all the negatives of both (L- and R-). The polarity must be seen as a both/and, not an either/or situation. Sometimes one pole needs to be emphasized over the other, but both needs to be worked at. (This goes with other common church fight scenarios that are really poles to be managed: the church exists for member/the church exists for others; nurture/evangelism; word/deed; pietism/social action; mind/heart; etc.) If a group cannot determine what the polarities are, they can start to fill out a chart by filling in the quadrants directly. Start at the lower left (L-) and have them list what they are complaining against and wish to escape by making the desired change. Then have them fill in the upper right quadrant (R+), listing what they hope to achieve. Then get them to start to think about why people are resisting the change and the positive things they were experiencing. What are people afraid will happen, and what are they afraid of losing or leaving behind. At the same time, they can be thinking about the two poles that are defining the issue, but make sure the polarities have neutral, non-threatening, non-emotional connotations about them. The "neutral" axis, the line dividing the upsides from the downsides in the model, becomes important when building dilemmas that are emotionally loaded. At either end of the neutral axis there is usually a word which identifies the pole, like Individual or Team. This word should be as neutral as possible. If it is considered positive or negative, it belongs in the respective upper or lower quadrants above or below the neutral line [229]. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Return to Top | Because the polarities are interdependent,
there will be those who favor and push for change ("crusaders")
and those who resist the change and want to keep things the same ("tradition
bearers"). In contrast, a good manager, or change agent, must
be able to understand both, and occasionally be both, acting according to
the current need of the system. When being a crusader, and while talking
to some one resistant to a move, it is helpful to get them to first talk
about what they like best about the "tradition" (the pole they
prefer), then what they don't want, or fear will happen, in the new.
Let the person know that you are aware of the strengths of their side, and
want to preserve those strengths, and that you are also aware of the potential
dangers ahead and are working to prevent them. After they realize you understand
their values, desires and concerns, then talk about your vision and the
values of the move.
When being a tradition bearer and while talking to some one who wants to make a change, start with their values and perceptions. Ask them how they perceive the current situation, that is, talk about the negatives. Then ask them what they hope the change will bring about. Afterwards, assure them that you also understand the current problems, and want the same positive outcomes that they want. After they know you understand their concerns and desires, then express your fears to where they want the system to head, as well as what you appreciate and value in the current way. Notice that as a tradition-bearer, you not only joined the crusaders by trying to see their reality first, you also moved through the quadrants with the direction of movement they wanted to pursue. By making the rip through the quadrants in this fashion, you gain some credibility and get a more complete picture of all four quadrants. You also increase the possibility of being heard. It is worth the trip. The objective of the effective tradition-bearer is not to block crusades but to join them and challenge them at the same time. To join them is to recognize that the situation is a polarity that needs managing. That means there will be regular times when there needs to be a shift in focus from [one to the other] .. and that it will shift back again [p. 71]. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Barry Johnson gives example after
example of different polarities, as well as how he has helped different
groups solve their polarity problems. There is an excellent discussion
of the autocratic/ participatory decision making and the centralized/decentralize
polarities. On the one hand, managers have to combat the fear of individuals,
or groups, who refuse to take delegated authority, make a decision and act,
and who insist decisions have to be made by the group as a whole, or that
a higher authority just has to tell them what to do. On the other hand,
managers have to maintain cooperation, unity and work toward a common vision
among individuals and groups. Critical issues and directions must be handed
down, but details and actions still need to be carried out by smaller groups.
It is the old problem of committees waiting for the session to tell them
what to do and the sessions wondering why the committees aren't doing anything.
It is also the problem why some sessions spend too much time on management
concerns and end up working as a committee of the whole. Committees
and individuals must be given both clear direction and accountability, while
also given freedom, authority and respect to act.
I wholeheartedly recommend this book for everyone associated with management, leadership and seeking change. It is easy to read, and well laid out with charts, case studies and discussion questions. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Return to Top |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Magazines |
The Christian Century, a magazine devoted to denominational news, social trends, book reviews and articles for pastors of mainline denominations; tends to be liberal politically and moderate theologically. Christian History, a magazine giving articles, books reviews, photographs and history lessons regarding a person, theme or movement that is important to Christianity. Christian Research Journal, a magazine that probes modern religious movements, promotes doctrinal discernment and critical thinking, provides reasons for Christian faith and ethics, and information on evangelizing cults and different religion. Homiletics, a preaching magazine giving suggestions for sermons, illustrations and Biblical commentary, with an emphasis upon the new, catchy and contemporary.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Return to Top | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||